Prayer Society Intention for October, Month of the Queen of the Holy Rosary
“Queen of the Holy Rosary, in these times of such brazen impiety, manifest thy power with the signs of thine ancient victories.” (Raccolta)
.
+Feast of St. Therese of Lisieux+
Introduction
This isn’t the blog I intended to post — I said there would be no further remarks about the Kirk assassination. But given the air of uncertainty and even dread that seems to linger following recent events, I felt perhaps that some reminders are in order. It seems really strange that some who ordinarily are the first to point out the dangers of Zionism suddenly are very quiet when it comes to the mysterious circumstances surrounding the death of Charlie Kirk. Certainly I am not trying to lionize Kirk or portray him as a martyr. But neither will I allow others to ignore the facts that are emerging regarding his assassination that confirm the renouncement of his pro-Israel stance and his journey to what he believed was Catholicism.
That being said, it is interesting to note that FBI director Patel has apparently broken the agency’s ties with the ADL after they listed Kirk’s Turning Point USA as an extremist organization. They then “retired” the extremist list, making it unavailable to those whose names might appear there unofficially. The ADL is a cover organization for B’nai B’rith (Sons of the Covenant), a Masonic Jewish organization which according to Lady Queenborough’s Occult Theocracy “…is the supreme body shaping and directing, for the attainment of its own ends, the policies, whatever they may be, of all Freemasonry, beginning with the Grand Lodge of England, the Grand Orient and Scottish rites and ending in [Aleister Crowley’s] OTO, which is the Illuminati under another name.” An Irish Catholic publication (The Fiat, letter 38) described the aims of the 12 men guiding B’nai B’rith as “the fulfillment of ‘the Covenant,’ the supposed Messianic promise of rulership over all peoples… under a one-world government.”
The recent rush to identify anti-Semitic hate speech and activities and punish offenders coincides with Netanyahu’s outreach to American social media personalities and the recent acquisition of TikTok by pro-Israel buyers. This is especially of note since Netanyahu described social media as a new weapon to prop up Israel’s flagging image in the U.S. Some are questioning whether a May 2, 2025, letter Kirk sent Netanyahu, released to the public earlier this week, is the actual letter Kirk wrote. But Kirk’s disillusionment with Israel and Netanyahu did not peak until the last few months of his life, so would not necessarily have been reflected there.
All these developments are only the culmination of what we were warned about by two Catholic politicians, Pres. John F. Kennedy and Sen. Joseph McCarthy, who, like Kirk, would die for being identified as Catholic and for warning Americans about the enemy. (McCarthy wasn’t assassinated, but his death is often attributed to the alcoholism that was exacerbated by the opposition to his stance against Communism.) McCarthy learned too late that Communism was not the enemy he was fighting after all, but only one of its many tentacles. This he revealed in a speech given just six months before his death.
George Washington’s Surrender
“And many of the people of the land became Jews” (Esther 9:17). The confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown has been well hidden by historians. History books and textbooks have taught for years that when Cornwallis surrendered his army to General Washington, American independence came and we lived happily ever after until the tribulations of the 20th century.
“Jonathan Williams recorded in his Legions of Satan ,1781, that Cornwallis revealed to Washington that, “A holy war will now begin on America and when it is ended America will be supposedly the citadel of freedom but her millions will unknowingly be loyal subjects to the Crown.” Cornwallis went on to explain what would seem to be a self-contradiction: “Your churches will be used to teach the Jew’s religion and in less than 200 years the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry.” And indeed George Washington himself was a Mason and he gave back through a false religion what he had won with his army.
“Cornwallis knew that his military defeat was only the beginning of world catastrophe that would be universal and that unrest would continue until mind control would be accomplished through a false religion. What he predicted has come to pass. A brief sketch of American religious history and we have seen Masonry infused into every church in America with their veiled phallic religion. Darby and the Plymouth brethren brought a Jewish Christianity to America. Masons Rutherford and Russell started Jehovah’s Witness Judaism which is now worldwide, with their message of the Divine Kingdom. Mason Joseph Smith started Mormon Judaism with its Jewish teaching of millennialism. At the turn of the 20th century there appeared the Scofield Bible with a Jewish interpretation of the prophecies. With a wide use of this “helpful” aid, all the American churches have silently become synagogues.
“We now have Baptist Jews, Methodist Jews, Church of God Jews, apostate Catholic Jews and many Protestant Jews throughout America. We are aliens in our own country because of false religion. All are praying for divine deliverance into the Divine Commonwealth which Cornwallis knew to be the British Empire. A false religion has been used to deceive us into allegiance to our enemies of Yorktown and Bunker Hill. No! Not a gun has been fired but the invisible and malignant process of conquering America with the Jews’ religion has gone on unabated. The Union Jack has been planted in our hearts with religious deception. All has happened legally, constitutionally, “freely” and completely within our most sacred trust — our churches. Religious deception is painless inoculation against truth. It cannot be removed in the conscience with surgery yet it is the motivator of our actions and directly controls our lives. Once man gives over to false religion he is no longer rational because he originates no thought. His life is controlled by whomever controls his religion.
“The veil of false religion is the sword of Damocles and its power to control humanity defies even the imagination of tyrants who use it.
“This is not to say that George Washington was a traitor willingly or knowingly. He was beguiled into a satanic religious order that insidiously controls man’s minds. So have American statesman and military leaders down through the years given aid and allegiance to the enemies of the United States because they did not have knowledge of the invisible subterfuge that stalks this land. My eyes were opened the day my colleagues from Ohio handed me Wagner’s Freemasonry: an Interpretation. If every American would read it they would no longer ask why and how it has happened.” (End of McCarthy speech, given some time in October 1956).
It should be noted that according to the Feb. 24, 1957 edition of the Denver Catholic Register, George Washington converted to Catholicism on his deathbed (the website referenced is not Catholic and is used only for purposes of attribution). And of course McCarthy did not live to see the destruction of the Church by the very forces he unmasked. His speech and the following excerpts from a speech to members of the press given by Pres. John F. Kennedy should be read very carefully and digested slowly. When this is done, their implications for our own times are all too clear.
President John F. Kennedy, Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New York City, April 27, 1961
“My purpose here tonight is not to deliver the usual assault on the so-called one-party press. On the contrary… My topic tonight is a more sober one of concern to publishers as well as editors.
“I want to talk about our common responsibilities in the face of a common danger. The events of recent weeks may have helped to illuminate that challenge for some; but the dimensions of its threat have loomed large on the horizon for many years. Whatever our hopes may be for the future — for reducing this threat or living with it — there is no escaping either the gravity or the totality of its challenge to our survival and to our security — a challenge that confronts us in unaccustomed ways in every sphere of human activity.
“This deadly challenge imposes upon our society two requirements of direct concern both to the press and to the President — two requirements that may seem almost contradictory in tone, but which must be reconciled and fulfilled if we are to meet this national peril. I refer, first, to the need for a far greater public information; and, second, to the need for far greater official secrecy.
“The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.
“But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country’s peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of “clear and present danger,” the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public’s need for national security.
“Today no war has been declared — and however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger. And yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired. If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of “clear and present danger,” then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.
“It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions — by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence — on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
“Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.
Nevertheless, every democracy recognizes the necessary restraints of national security — and the question remains whether those restraints need to be more strictly observed if we are to oppose this kind of attack as well as outright invasion.
“For the facts of the matter are that this nation’s foes have openly boasted of acquiring through our newspapers information they would otherwise hire agents to acquire through theft, bribery or espionage; that details of this nation’s covert preparations to counter the enemy’s covert operations have been available to every newspaper reader, friend and foe alike; that the size, the strength, the location and the nature of our forces and weapons, and our plans and strategy for their use, have all been pinpointed in the press and other news media to a degree sufficient to satisfy any foreign power; and that, in at least in one case, the publication of details concerning a secret mechanism whereby satellites were followed required its alteration at the expense of considerable time and money.
“The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.
“The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.” (End of Kennedy excerpts)
Conclusion
Does this put readers in mind of print and TV media misinformation, leaks, cherry-picked facts, remarks taken out of context, biased reporting and even the publication of outright lies? If it doesn’t, it should, for certainly it is rife even among those who present as “conservative” journalists. And the restricted form of reporting happening now in the investigation of various assassinations, murders and attempted murders is exactly what Kennedy warns against above, for certainly no one can claim that such a lack of transparency on the part of the DOJ, FBI, CIA, NSA and other agencies is a matter of national security. For the very enemies we should worry about the most, according to Sen. MacCarthy, are welcomed with open arms. And they were the ones who, Pres. Kennedy notes, were busily infiltrating the ranks long ago. McCarthy warned us. Bella Dodd warned us, and several others. Now we pay the price for ignoring them.
So are we going to drown ourselves in half-baked conspiracy theories and once again ignore what is really going on around us today? This war is a psyops operation alright, but it isn’t about politics. This war has been spiritual from the beginning — principalities, powers and the rulers of this world of darkness — so why would it not continue to intensify along spiritual lines? If you controlled a worldwide web of secret operations that would one day lead to your proclamation as a one-world leader, what would you do if an intelligent and charismatic young person capable of energizing the youth so important to the future (as the Alta Vendita reveals) — a person who had once been a major asset to your operation — did an about face and threatened to head these youths and others around him in a different direction, one diametrically opposed to all you had worked for? Why did Netanyahu feel compelled to publicly announce he was not involved in Kirk’s assassination? Why are so many ignoring the obvious implications and failing to consider alternative sources as the reason for discrepancies in the investigation?
If Kennedy’s own assassination and its well-orchestrated coverup didn’t convince Americans that everything must be immediately documented following such an event, and with the right persons, nothing will. The further away we journey from all these mass shootings and supposed lone gunmen; the longer the investigation is allowed to be “ongoing,” and protected from intense media scrutiny (by conscientious members of the media), the further we stray from the truth.
One day it will be illegal to mention the Jewish religion in anything that could be interpreted in a negative manner. Before that happens, maybe responsible journalists need to make some really objective enquiries and stop sending people down rabbit holes.
